It's not often that I stare at my laptop and actually scream in outrage (apart from during an overly tense episode of some trashy TV series). That said, I'm known for being a tad dramatic - scrap that - highly dramatic when it comes to crossing the road without looking (I do this a lot), being tickled or watching Rafael Nadal play tennis.
Let's get to the crux of the issue: Hopkins bases who her children are allowed to play with solely on the child's name. Why? Because apparently the Tylers, Brandons, Ashlees, Charmains and Chardonnays of this world are working class children who aren't fit to wine and dine with her own league-above-the-rest offspring. And not only that - a boy with a name like Tyler never does his homework, spends class-time being disruptive and beats up children in the playground. Such is the way in Hopkins' shallow universe. In a nutshell, her remarks are so unfounded, so excessive and so ignorant that I can't even take offense.
One of the "name categories" she sneered at and labeled unfit for playdates was geograpahical locations (ironic that her own daughter is called India). Being called Montana then, I guess I'm screwed. Although maybe I'd beg at my knees and insist that rather than the American state, I was actually named after the New Zealand wine company (then again, she hates the Chardonnays of this world, so I suppose being named after wine wouldn't improve my situation!) Or perhaps I'd go for the the protagonist from the 1983 film Scarface, or, God forbid it, Hannah Montana (despite her being a year my junior.) Oh wait, she hates celebrity names too. That includes Gwyneth Paltrow's daughter's name: Apple. So I suppose that also cancels out "food" names. There's a chocolate bar called Montana and I recently discovered a Montana bagel in a cafe too. I'm really not doing too well at this game. Oh, and why not hate on the gingers too:
Wait, just wait! Her daughter is called Poppy and there's a Clematis called Montana - a vigorous climbing plant. *Dances around wildly*. There is hope!
On a slightly different note; one thing being abroad in Paris has reminded me is that socialising with people from other backgrounds, nationalities, classes, cultures, religions - however you want to divide them - is one of the most fuelling and enriching things you can experience. Katie insists that fast-tracking - culling people with certain names from your social circles - is a quick way to avoid spending time with people who will be detrimental to your environment and success. But why the desperate need to take a (what I would argue counterproductive) short cut? Life is short which is why young people should make the most of enriching rather than limiting their social circles. After all, no-one comes in or leaves the world less equal to the next. Whether they're called Chardonnay or Matilda.